“The ruling party should learn from the mistakes of the #PDP, which led to its eventual disintegration and defeat in the last general elections because the PDP behaved like an umpire that could do it all alone by boasting to even rule for 60 years. The #APC, though still controlling a majority of members in the National Assembly, should always remember that it cannot always have its way at all times.” -Kupoluyi
The legislative palace coup that took place in the National Assembly a few days ago, which led to the election of its leadership, would remain controversial in the nation’s political landscape. We recall that while some #All Progressives Congress senators were waiting to meet with #President Muhammadu Buhari at the #International Conference Centre, Abuja, to resolve the contending issues over the election of the National Assembly leadership, Senator Bukola Saraki was quickly elected as the #President of the Senate, mostly by senators elected on the platform of the opposition #Peoples Democratic Party. The proposed meeting with President #Buhari was meant to take a decisive stance on the earlier position of the APC to elect its preferred candidates, #Senator Ahmed Lawan for the Senate presidency and #Femi Gbajabiamila as the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
The elections, which were conducted at variance with the party’s instruction, saw Saraki (APC, Kwara Central) being sworn-in as the #President of the Eighth Senate, while Ike Ekweremadu (PDP, Enugu West) was sworn-in as the #deputy senate president by the Clerk of the National Assembly, Mr. Salisu Maikasuwa. Saraki was elected unopposed by 57 out of the 108 senators-elect. Ekweremadu, on his part, polled 54 votes to beat Senator Ali Ndume (APC, Borno South), who scored 20 votes, while one vote was declared invalid. In all, 51 senators, including Lawan (APC, Yobe North), were absent when Saraki was elected. George Akume, who was the party’s preferred candidate for the position of Deputy Senate President, also lost out to Ekwerenmadu.
Initially, the APC rejected the elections of Saraki and that of Yakubu Dogora, who emerged as the Speaker, House of Representatives and vowed to punish its members that were involved in what could be described as a grand conspiracy and inordinate ambition to undermine the party’s desire to pick candidates of its choice for the National Assembly topmost positions. The APC vowed that those who worked against the interest of the party risked being suspended or given outright expulsion for disregarding the directive not to stand for the elections in line with Article 9.1 Sub-Section 2 of its constitution. The party later changed its mind that it had accepted the outcome of the elections.
Though unfortunate, the development is an abysmal failure on the part of the APC to meet the very basic requirements of a strong party with unity of thought, action and discipline. This is shown by the fact that the succession crisis was engineered purely by greed and ambition of affected lawmakers, who refused to submit to the decision of the party on whose platform they were elected in the first instance. What has just played out is nothing but a betrayal of trust and disrespect to the tenets of party supremacy. Following the unfolding drama, there seems to be two dimensions to the way and manner of how the leadership of the National Assembly emerged.
While some feel that the elections of Saraki and Dogara as Senate President and Speaker of the House of Representatives respectively, were a welcome development, others view the circumstance in which they emerged as a brazen insult and assault on our polity. Those in first position argue that though the action may not be politically right, but it is legally okay hinging their argument on Section 50 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution (as amended), which states that the process of electing leaders of the National Assembly should be carried out inside the two chambers among the members themselves without an outside interference. This second group believes that a quorum was not formed before the elections (or selection) and therefore, there were no valid elections. This group further contends that at least 75 senators ought to have participated in the process instead of the 57 that actually took part in it. For me, the elections smack short of morality and credibility. Already, members of the Senate Unity Forum, a group of senators in support of Lawan, have vowed to seek legal redress.
A similar parliamentary coup took place in 2011, before the inauguration of the Seventh National Assembly, when the ruling PDP, which then had the majority in the two chambers, had concluded arrangement to zone the leadership positions. For the Upper Chamber, the senators had already planned to maintain the party’s status quo but the scenario was different in the Lower Chamber as the party leadership had zoned the speakership to the South-West with the South-South, North-West and North-Central occupying the first, second and third positions, respectively. At the end, the game plan changed as the opposition members in the House alongside some PDP lawmakers upturned the zoning arrangement. Aminu Tambuwal, then Sokoto PDP, emerged the Speaker against the PDP’s chosen candidate from the South-West, Mulikat Akande-Adeola.
As we await how events unfold, the way and manner that the APC handles this issue will determine the fate of the party under the current dispensation. While the members of the legislature should be encouraged and allowed to choose their leaders, the position of the political parties of the members who constitute the legislature should also not be shoved aside. This will help to manage avoidable frictions that could ensure when there are challenges in carrying out legislative duties. The ruling party should learn from the mistakes of the PDP, which led to its eventual disintegration and defeat in the last general elections because the PDP behaved like an umpire that could do it all alone by boasting to even rule for 60 years. The APC, though still controlling a majority of members in the National Assembly, should always remember that it cannot always have its way at all times. There is the need to carry other political parties along in the course of carrying out its constitutional duties. Robust politicking is about fair negotiation, consensus building and compromises.
Now that the deed has been done, the APC should immediately embark on damage control to douse the tension generated by the controversial elections. It is too early in the current dispensation for the party to be enmeshed in this kind of crisis that is capable of causing cracks and dislocation that could eventually prevent it from delivering good governance to the citizens. The people the party chooses as leaders of the three arms of government would largely determine its success or failure. That is why we should ensure that those who have emerged truly serve the Nigerian people. The APC should avoid being seen as a disappointment by failing to deliver the desired change it promised during the electioneering. The leadership of the party should manage its success by eschewing unnecessary personal interest, speak with one voice and allow national interest to take pre-eminence in the conduct of their affairs. The fallout of a divided house would be too severe to imagine. This time round, the electorate deserve the best and the desired change should certainly begin from the National Assembly.
Kupoluyi wrote from Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta via firstname.lastname@example.org, @AdewaleKupoluyi
If you need current information on the forex market in nigeria and Authentic Pool information, then consider visiting this site again.
Nomie Autos Bonanza: get 30% discount on any car you buy; hurry, offer exists while stock lasts.
Follow us on twitter @newsbeatportal
Engage #SantexTech today to build & install inverters, training on inverters & other electronic designs, projects/kits. Call 08039574535
Click to join Talk Nigeria Today, a group where hot, controversial, and breathtaking issues are brainstormed upon.